[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: mathptm + cmex9

Thomas Esser writes:
 > mathptm currently uses cmex9 which is a pity, because there is no
 > cmex9.pfb in the BSR/AMS set.
 > Since you are preparing a new set of the metrics: do you think that it
 > is a good idea to stop using cmex9 for mathptm?

does cmex10 scaled down produce identical results in terms of spacing?