[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: \substitutesilent{l}{m}

"UV" == Ulrik Vieth writes:

 UV> For this reason, the substitutions presently included in fontinst
 UV> seem to be necessary, but adding the inverse substitutions isn't
 UV> really needed.

Thanks for clarification. But why then fontinst has by default _both_
"forward" and "inverse" silent substitutions for `b' and `bx', as well
as for `sl' and `it'?

	Best regards, -- Vladimir.