[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: News of AFII: international standard registry of glyphs andtheir identifiers
> <Peter_Constable@sil.org> wrote:
[snip]
>
> There is a final group that this registry might benefit: those
> that are involved in developing algorithms for rendering of
> complex scripts (those involving reordering, substitution,
> etc.) Whatever technologies are used for handling such
> rendering (state tables in GX, TTO, etc.) the algorithms that
> do the rendering must operate on glyphs. Now, if there were a
> font-independent way to refer to glyphs, then an algorithm that
> has been implemented for a given writing system could
> potentially be used for any number of fonts that are designed
> to support that writing system, provided that all of those
> fonts use the same glyph identifiers assumed in the
> implementation of the rendering algorithm. This is where I see
> the biggest potential payoff. That is one reason why our
> organization will plan to use this registry or, if we find that
> this really is a lame duck, an equivalent of our own.
>
At least to me, this sounds pretty similar to what fontinst does. As far as
I know, fontinst has nothing whatsoever to do with unicode, but
standardized glyph names is certainly something it has use for.
Lars Hellström