[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad afm file from Linotype
On Fri, 05 Feb 1999 07:35:08 -0500, Berthold Horn wrote:
>>CC idieresis 2 ; PCC dotlessi 0 0 ; PCC dieresis -8 0 ;
>
>Right, although, there is no reason for any software to look
> ... Is it AFM2TFM that complains?
I just tried to fix what I found. I did not check each
single "bug" whether it was relevant.
With the original afm file renamed to lubr8a.afm
(I do know that this is wrong ;-) fontinst stumbled
for the first time at
INFO> run \transformfont <lubr8r> from <lubr8a>
(lubr8a.afm
! Argument of \afm_line has an extra }.
<inserted text>
\par
<to be read again>
}
<inserted text>
}\endwrite
\out_line ...mediate \write \out_file {#1}
l.1219 CC scaron 2 ;
PCC s 0 0 ; PCC 62 0 ;
And, yes, afmtfm 8.1 failed, too:
! composite character name not found
CC Zcaron 2 ; PCC Z 0 0 ; PCC 150 185 ;
>In this case Linotype is distributing a font that is not free
>of errors. Also the hinting is not good.
Linotype ... I am terribly disappointed.
Thank you for the helpful reply
Walter