[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CM fonts updated?

To: "tex-fonts" <tex-fonts@math.utah.edu>, "Ulrik Vieth" <vieth@thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Subject: Re: CM fonts updated?
From: "Walter Schmidt" <wschmi@ibm.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 20:41:23 +0100
Cc: "server@dante.de" <server@dante.de>
Priority: Normal
Reply-To: "wschmi@ibm.net" <wschmi@ibm.net>

On Wed, 3 Mar 1999 15:04:16 +0100, Ulrik Vieth wrote:

>Compared to the AMS version of cmex9, the only significant difference
>it is the font identifier ("CMEX" vs. "CMEX V2.2") and some whitespace
>in the source file, which shouldn't affect the generated fonts at all.

Oh, I should have checked this before complaining.  :-(
Yet, thank you for the explanation.

>A similar version conflict also exists for the file ebigof.mf

Oh, this one is really bad!  

Thank you

Walter

Prev by Date: Re: text encoding compatibility
Next by Date: Re: CM fonts updated?
Prev by thread: Re: CM fonts updated?
Next by thread: Re: CM fonts updated?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread