[tex-k] (fwd) Bug#266718: dvips: Fails to properly include fontsused both in EPS and in document

Thomas Esser te at dbs.uni-hannover.de
Tue Nov 9 00:34:22 CET 2004

> Hmm, I guess I have to do an Perforce Checkout to see the correct
> Changelog. The dvips in teTeX-beta itself looks more recent.

$ diff -ru /t/src/tetex-src/texk/dvipsk /t/texlive/Build/source.development/TeX/texk/dvipsk/ | grep ^diff
diff -ru /t/src/tetex-src/texk/dvipsk/configure /t/texlive/Build/source.development/TeX/texk/dvipsk/configure
diff -ru /t/src/tetex-src/texk/dvipsk/depend.mk /t/texlive/Build/source.development/TeX/texk/dvipsk/depend.mk
diff -ru /t/src/tetex-src/texk/dvipsk/dvips.help /t/texlive/Build/source.development/TeX/texk/dvipsk/dvips.help
diff -ru /t/src/tetex-src/texk/dvipsk/dvips.info /t/texlive/Build/source.development/TeX/texk/dvipsk/dvips.info
diff -ru /t/src/tetex-src/texk/dvipsk/stamp-auto.in /t/texlive/Build/source.development/TeX/texk/dvipsk/stamp-auto.in

In fact, there are *no* differences, other than those caused by running
  ./configure --enable-maintainer-mode ... && make \
    && (cd texk && make depend) && make distclean
which is what I sometimes do.

> I guess, thats due to the the fact, that all locations within the
> texmf-tree changed. I guess, I have to install the whole tetex-beta

Not all have been changed :-)


More information about the tex-k mailing list