[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MathML
- To: Ulrik Vieth <vieth@thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de>
- Subject: Re: MathML
- From: Hans Aberg <haberg@matematik.su.se>
- Date: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 16:34:07 +0200
- Cc: Math Font Discuss <math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk>
At 14:42 +0200 97/10/07, Ulrik Vieth wrote:
>> I suggest readers of this group to have a look at the MathML protocol
>> <http://www.w3.org/>:
>
>I think I've already pointed this out some time back, but thanks for the
>reminder anyway.
It appeared inside discussions in the LaTeX3 mailing list in June and
this month, but I wanted to get the attention of "laymen" that may read
these groups, and in this group especially for the following:
>Anyway, it would be nice if someone could find the time to do a
>detailed comparison of both, particularly
>- what kinds of symbols are in MathML and Unicode that we don't have
>- what kinds of symbols do we have, that don't existing elsewhere
>- what kinds of symbols have been proposed, that don't exist anywhere
Because I figure the gaps will be discovered by people checking if
"their" stuff is there. (See <http://www.unicode.org/Unicode.charts/> for
rendering of Unicode characters.)
Hans Aberg
* AMS member: Listing <http://www.ams.org/cml/>
* Email: Hans Aberg <haberg@member.ams.org>