[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Adobe Glyph List
- To: Thierry.Bouche@ujf-grenoble.fr
- Subject: Re: Adobe Glyph List
- From: Ulrik Vieth <vieth@thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 14:43:57 +0100
- Cc: support@YandY.com, math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk
> Concernant « Adobe Glyph List », Y&Y, Inc. écrit :
> « Adobe Glyph List
> «
> « http://www.adobe.com/supportservice/devrelations/typeforum/glyphlist.txt
> contains some `pearls' like
> 002D;hyphen;HYPHEN-MINUS
> 2245;congruent;APPROXIMATELY EQUAL TO
> 2248;approxequal;ALMOST EQUAL TO
> this leads to the conclusion that unicode names are rarely
> appropriate, and should be used with much care...
Do you prefer the Mathematica font mappings?
/opt/math3/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/UnicodeCharacters.tr:
0x002D \[RawDash] ($&hyphen$) Alias
0x00AD \[Hyphen] () Letter
0x2013 \[Dash] ($-$ $&ndash$) Letter
0x2014 \[LongDash] ($--$ $&mdash$) Letter
0x2245 \[TildeFullEqual] ($~==$ $&cong$ $\cong$) Infix 390 None 5 5
0x2248 \[TildeTilde] ($~~$ $&thkap$ $\approx$) Infix 390 None 5 5
Note that there doesn't seem to be any allocation for \[Minus],
while \[Hyphen] is given a separate slot.
/opt/math3/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/TextResources/UnicodeFontMapping.tr:
'-' N 2 0x2d # \[RawDash]
0x00AD N 1 0x2d # \[Hyphen]
0x2245 N 2 0x40 # \[TildeFullEqual]
0x2248 N 2 0xbb # \[TildeTilde]
If you look into the reverse mapping, you'll see that \[RawDash]
and \[Hyphen] are resolved differently: hyphen is 0x2d in font 1
(= Times-Roman) whereas minus is 0x2d in font 2 (= Math1).
Cheers, Ulrik.