[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (hooks) MathML arrow fonts
- To: haberg@matematik.su.se, taco.hoekwater@wkap.nl
- Subject: Re: (hooks) MathML arrow fonts
- From: vojta@math.berkeley.edu (Paul Vojta)
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 12:26:29 -0800
- Cc: math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk, vojta@math.berkeley.edu
- Content-Length: 880
> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 12:11:54 +0100
> To: Taco Hoekwater <taco.hoekwater@wkap.nl>
> From: Hans Aberg <haberg@matematik.su.se>
> Subject: Re: (hooks) MathML arrow fonts
> Cc: vojta@math.berkeley.edu (Paul Vojta), math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk
>
> At 09:33 +0100 1998/11/18, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> > PV> \lhook, \rhook (as in AmSTeX)
> >
> >I intend to add these two, but thanks for reminding me. These are
> >essentially building blocks like the arrow tails, yes?
>
> They are actually defined in PlainTeX, see Knuth's The TeXBook, p 358. He
> uses them exclusively to build hooks on arrows.
>
> I think that Paul Vojta should indicate how he is using them: If used as
> binary operations, then they should have separate slots in Unicode.
I use them as building blocks for long arrows, etc. I do not use them
as binary relations.
--Paul Vojta, vojta@math.berkeley.edu