[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

**To**:*Hans Aberg <haberg@matematik.su.se>, vojta@math.berkeley.edu***Subject**:**Re: MathML arrow fonts****From**:*Taco Hoekwater <taco.hoekwater@wkap.nl>***Date**: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 09:46:35 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time)**Cc**:*math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk*- Content-Length: 959

>>>>> "HA" == Hans Aberg <haberg@matematik.su.se> writes: HA> At 12:38 -0800 1998/11/18, Paul Vojta wrote: >>> Have a look at chars 105/107. Are these the ones intended? >>> >>> they are labeled "simrightarrow" and "simleftarrow". >> Yes, but I would make the \sim part larger. For example, if you >> took \simeq from the AMS fonts HA> This is also defined in PlainTeX. >> and put an arrow head on the right, then that would look more like >> what I would expect. HA> I agree with Paul on this: These labels on the shaft can be HA> larger. In TeX these labels are also put rather long away out HA> from the shaft; I think that putting the labels more away from HA> the shaft is allowable if it looks good in graphics, but it is HA> not necessary to go as far as TeX does it. Is noted. This (and all other comments) will be fixed in the (for now) final draft version of the arrow font, which should be available by the weekend. Taco

- Prev by Date:
**Re: MathML arrow fonts** - Next by Date:
**Re: Binary Relations, draft 1** - Prev by thread:
**Re: MathML arrow fonts** - Next by thread:
**Re: (hooks) MathML arrow fonts** - Index(es):