[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Binary Relations, draft 1
- To: Chris Rowley <C.A.Rowley@open.ac.uk>
- Subject: Re: Binary Relations, draft 1
- From: Hans Aberg <haberg@matematik.su.se>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1998 17:23:53 +0100
- Cc: math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk
- Content-Length: 1140
At 15:33 +0000 1998/11/19, Chris Rowley wrote:
>But an empicist approach, and Occam's razor, I think would then
>suggest to you that Bethold's extrapolation (which is not entirely
>empirical) is superior.
>> Sorry, I do not know about Bethold's extrapolation
>
>And I typoed his name, ouch!--- it is Berthold, but he tends to lurk
>on lists under his arcane nom de commerce: Y&Y, Inc.
>
>But he has many years, or even decades, of involvement in the production
>of technical documents so I would advise you to listen carefully to
>what he writes (except about font encodings:-).
But this does not explain why Berthold's extrapolation as philosophical
principle is any better than empiricism and Occam's razor: I mean, Occam's
razor says that fewer primitives in order to explain a phenomenon is better
than many.
I am interested to know the theoretical foundation of this new
philosophical principle you mention. :-)
Hans Aberg
* Email: Hans Aberg <mailto:haberg@member.ams.org>
* Home Page: <http://www.matematik.su.se/~haberg/>
* AMS member listing: <http://www.ams.org/cml/>