[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: psnfss and lw35nfss

To: s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk, tex-fonts@math.utah.edu
Subject: Re: psnfss and lw35nfss
From: KNAPPEN@VKPMZD.kph.Uni-Mainz.DE
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 1997 13:11:27 +0100
Flags: 000000000000

Sebastian wrote:

> the problem is not the TeX vendors, but the font vendors. if a font
> has dotless j, it'll be used. The Lucida fonts have it, for instance.

It is, however, far easier to persuade half a dozen of TeX vendors to 
support a certain special in their drivers than to persuade 100+ font 
vendors to change 1500+ fonts.

And dvips is the most often used dvi driver with a huge market share.

--J"org Knappen.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: psnfss and lw35nfss
  - From: Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: psnfss and lw35nfss
Next by Date: Re: psnfss and lw35nfss
Prev by thread: Re: psnfss and lw35nfss
Next by thread: Re: psnfss and lw35nfss
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread