[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: psnfss and lw35nfss

To: bkph@ai.mit.edu
Subject: Re: psnfss and lw35nfss
From: Thierry Bouche <Thierry.Bouche@ujf-grenoble.fr>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 14:54:26 +0100 (MET)
Cc: tex-fonts@math.utah.edu
Flags: 000000000000
In-Reply-To: <199702031302.IAA14236@kauai.ai.mit.edu>
References: <199702021045.KAA23655@lochnagarn.elsevier.co.uk><199702031302.IAA14236@kauai.ai.mit.edu>
Reply-To: thierry.bouche@ujf-grenoble.fr

Concernant Ť Re: psnfss and lw35nfss ť, Berthold K.P. Horn écrit :
  > After all what are called `PostScript'
 > fonts on comp.text.tex are called `ATM fonts' in the rest of the
 > world, and while ATM provides better by far rasterization than any
 > PS interpreter - public domain or commercial - ATM does not include
 > a PS interpreter and so cannot handle `PS trickery'. 


how would you call AJenson, then ? an ATM4+ font ? and MinionMM
ATM3.02 font ? It was definitely not an ATM2 font. No doubt this
dotlessj will be an ATM-300\varepsilon font!

Follow-Ups:
- Re: psnfss and lw35nfss
  - From: "Berthold K.P. Horn" <bkph@ai.mit.edu>

References:
- Re: psnfss and lw35nfss
  - From: Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk>
- Re: psnfss and lw35nfss
  - From: "Berthold K.P. Horn" <bkph@ai.mit.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: psnfss and lw35nfss
Next by Date: Re: psnfss and lw35nfss
Prev by thread: Re: psnfss and lw35nfss
Next by thread: Re: psnfss and lw35nfss
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread