[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: frutiger names in adobe.map

To: ulm@kph.uni-mainz.de
Subject: Re: frutiger names in adobe.map
From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 15:45:57 +0100
Cc: tex-fonts@tug.org
In-Reply-To: <200009181428.QAA03349@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
References: <"H00000770002e45a.0969207919.buffalo.u-blox.ch*"@MHS><14789.57749.142024.816724@spqr.oucs.ox.ac.uk><200009181428.QAA03349@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>

Ulrich Mueller writes:
 > Sebastian Rahtz writes:
 > 
 > >> is 8r still o.k.? ther were times when LY1 was a favourite...
 > > 8r does not include /mu. ly1 does
 > 
 > Did I miss something? My version of 8r.enc does include /mu:
ah, OK. i missed it...

8r rules OK!

sebastian

References:
- frutiger names in adobe.map
  - From: andreas.thiel@u-blox.com
- Re: frutiger names in adobe.map
  - From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>
- Re: frutiger names in adobe.map
  - From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@kph.uni-mainz.de>
- Re: frutiger names in adobe.map
  - From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@kph.uni-mainz.de>

Prev by Date: Re: frutiger names in adobe.map
Next by Date: Re: frutiger names in adobe.map
Prev by thread: Re: frutiger names in adobe.map
Next by thread: Re: frutiger names in adobe.map
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread