[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

**To**:*Ulrik Vieth <vieth@thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de>***Subject**:**Re: BSR CM type 1 arrows, StMaryRd, and RSFS****From**:*Chris Rowley <C.A.Rowley@open.ac.uk>***Date**: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 15:37:31 +0000 (GMT)**Cc**:*s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk, support@YandY.com, lcs@topo.math.u-psud.fr, rasmith@arete.com, tex-fonts@math.utah.edu*

Ulrik wrote -- > Sebastian Rahtz writes: > > > i don't know, actually. I dont *think* any of our typesetters use CM > > or MathTime, except maybe those few that use TeX. > > In that case I really wonder what else there is left you are you > using? I mean the whole work of the Math Font Group (*) was based > on the assumption that the choice of math fonts sets usable with > TeX was limitied to a handful of families such as CM, Concrete, > Euler, Adobe Symbol, MathTime, Lucida New Math, and Mathematica. Yes, Sebastian, it would certainly be very useful to know what fonts these typesetters do use for various math sorts. > > I can't find the details right now, but there was certainly some > discussion on math-font-discuss to the effect that some authors do > have a strong opinion on this topic, > The distinction between Script and Calligraphic is very muddled, > but it exists. Whilst on most matters typographical my fellow mathematicians are largely ignorant and not at all concerned, I know of none who cannot easily distinguish calligraphic (as in the CM fonts) from script. chris

- Prev by Date:
**Re: BSR CM type 1 arrows, StMaryRd, and RSFS** - Next by Date:
**Re: BSR CM type 1 arrows, StMaryRd, and RSFS** - Prev by thread:
**Re: BSR CM type 1 arrows, StMaryRd, and RSFS** - Next by thread:
**Re: BSR CM type 1 arrows, StMaryRd, and RSFS** - Index(es):