[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Math Arrows and Harpoons
- To: math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk
- Subject: Re: Math Arrows and Harpoons
- From: Taco Hoekwater <taco.hoekwater@wkap.nl>
- Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1998 09:45:24 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time)
- Content-Length: 1448
>>>>> "HA" == Hans Aberg <haberg@matematik.su.se> writes:
HA> On the qeustion of where the arrow head should be pointing: I
HA> think this is just a matter of style, actually, for in the case
HA> of 032 21B6 curvearrowleft 033 21B7 curvearrowright I feel sure
HA> it is not essential that the arrowhead points down. It should
HA> just be a curved shaft, and then the arrowhead should put onto as
HA> it looks best -- the ideal
Barbara, any comments from AFII? I'll mirror the other 5 arrows into
new slots so there will be versions with and without angled heads.
Btw, yesterday I posted a rather long list of symmetry cases (or think
I did). If this was not distributed, let me know, and I'll resend the
thing. (lots of "Question on XXX:" remarks).
HA> The arrows 180-182 could just as well be "unfilled
HA> arrowheads". -- The thing is if one draws an unfilled arrowhead
HA> by hand, then it becomes a triangle.
Thanks for a good suggestion. Something along these lines will make
them far less ugly.
HA> C204 has a strange name "rightimply", because I have never seen
HA> anybody using it, => is "implies", and <= is "impliedby" to me.
It's a weird thing too. For clarity: this is char #204, (index
F524). Try to use hashes for characters in fonts if you will to avoid
confusion with the table indices.
I'll keep your arrow table in the back of my head for the
future. Thanks for the time spent on that.
Greetings, Taco