[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

**To**:*Taco Hoekwater <taco.hoekwater@wkap.nl>***Subject**:**Re: MathML arrow fonts****From**:*Hans Aberg <haberg@matematik.su.se>***Date**: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 12:11:17 +0100**Cc**:*math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk, vojta@math.berkeley.edu (Paul Vojta)*- Content-Length: 802

At 09:39 +0100 1998/11/18, Taco Hoekwater wrote: >Have a look at chars 105/107. Are these the ones intended? > >they are labeled "simrightarrow" and "simleftarrow". .. >Hans, is this char 109? And if it is, I guess we need a left version >as well (meaning it has a fixed semantic)? On these arrows, 105/107/109 etc, I would myself prefer that the symbol on the arrow shaft is more to the middle and not towards the end. Otherwise, they look correct. They exist both left and right pointing. If you have space, I think you can add a variation with \cong as label on the shaft. Hans Aberg * Email: Hans Aberg <mailto:haberg@member.ams.org> * Home Page: <http://www.matematik.su.se/~haberg/> * AMS member listing: <http://www.ams.org/cml/>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Binary Relations, draft 1** - Next by Date:
**Re: (hooks) MathML arrow fonts** - Prev by thread:
**Re: MathML arrow fonts** - Next by thread:
**Re: MathML arrow fonts** - Index(es):