[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: mathptm.sty/pslatex.sty
- From: Sebastian Rahtz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 10:02:26 +0100
- Cc: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
- In-Reply-To: <email@example.com>
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <4831-Wed01Jul1998085628email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Piet van Oostrum writes:
> SR> We'll do it happily IF you can promise there is NO chance of old
> SR> documents changing their breaking.
> I think it is unreasonable to expect this. But then you can also make the
> change unhappily :=)
i have no intention of being shot by Frank Mittelbach, thank you!
> Mathptm is ugly anyway, so an occasional change in line or pagebreaks
> shouldn't harm too much.
the party line is that if you don't like it, you should switch to the
new "mathptmx" package, which *can* (and will) be changed if necessary
until it too becomes stable.