[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 8r encoding + xdvi :-(
- To: tex-fonts@math.utah.edu
- Subject: Re: 8r encoding + xdvi :-(
- From: David Aspinall <da@dcs.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 30 May 1995 12:23:27 +0100
- Cc: kb@cs.umb.edu, vojta@math.berkeley.edu, joachim.schnitter@sap-ag.de, s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk, Thomas Esser <te@informatik.uni-hannover.de>
- In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 30 May 1995 10:37:34 BST. <9505300837.AA25130@regulus.dbis.uh>
Thomas Esser said:
> Now the true story: the reencoding *does* work and it does work with
> the commercial type1 fonts from adobe as well as with the .gsf
> fonts.
I've communicated with him and discovered that he tested Times
(ptmr8r), for which there is no problem whether gsftopk uses .gsf or
.pfa files. I didn't test the Times .gsf files, so I assumed that
gsftopk got ptmr8r right because I was using a "real" Type 1 source.
HOWEVER, there *are* problems for other fonts. In particular, Thomas
has checked my findings that the font tables for pbkl8r and pplr8r are
incorrect when viewed in xdvi. Using dvips/gs I get a slightly
different (less bad!) mess --- in particular, the ligatures and other
characters aren't missing.
Thomas and I were using gs3.33, which seems to have introduced the
problem. I've just tested with gs 2.6.1 and and older font set;
things seem to be okay there.
I'll ask on comp.lang.postscript to see if somebody can advise.
- David.